chinwagsocial/spec/services/notify_service_spec.rb

474 lines
15 KiB
Ruby
Raw Permalink Normal View History

# frozen_string_literal: true
require 'rails_helper'
RSpec.describe NotifyService do
subject { described_class.new.call(recipient, type, activity) }
let(:user) { Fabricate(:user) }
let(:recipient) { user.account }
Account domain blocks (#2381) * Add <ostatus:conversation /> tag to Atom input/output Only uses ref attribute (not href) because href would be the alternate link that's always included also. Creates new conversation for every non-reply status. Carries over conversation for every reply. Keeps remote URIs verbatim, generates local URIs on the fly like the rest of them. * Conversation muting - prevents notifications that reference a conversation (including replies, favourites, reblogs) from being created. API endpoints /api/v1/statuses/:id/mute and /api/v1/statuses/:id/unmute Currently no way to tell when a status/conversation is muted, so the web UI only has a "disable notifications" button, doesn't work as a toggle * Display "Dismiss notifications" on all statuses in notifications column, not just own * Add "muted" as a boolean attribute on statuses JSON For now always false on contained reblogs, since it's only relevant for statuses returned from the notifications endpoint, which are not nested Remove "Disable notifications" from detailed status view, since it's only relevant in the notifications column * Up max class length * Remove pending test for conversation mute * Add tests, clean up * Rename to "mute conversation" and "unmute conversation" * Raise validation error when trying to mute/unmute status without conversation * Adding account domain blocks that filter notifications and public timelines * Add tests for domain blocks in notifications, public timelines Filter reblogs of blocked domains from home * Add API for listing and creating account domain blocks * API for creating/deleting domain blocks, tests for Status#ancestors and Status#descendants, filter domain blocks from them * Filter domains in streaming API * Update account_domain_block_spec.rb
2017-05-19 09:14:30 +10:00
let(:sender) { Fabricate(:account, domain: 'example.com') }
let(:activity) { Fabricate(:follow, account: sender, target_account: recipient) }
let(:type) { :follow }
it { expect { subject }.to change(Notification, :count).by(1) }
it 'does not notify when sender is blocked' do
recipient.block!(sender)
expect { subject }.to_not change(Notification, :count)
end
Optional notification muting (#5087) * Add a hide_notifications column to mutes * Add muting_notifications? and a notifications argument to mute! * block notifications in notify_service from hard muted accounts * Add specs for how mute! interacts with muting_notifications? * specs testing that hide_notifications in mutes actually hides notifications * Add support for muting notifications in MuteService * API support for muting notifications (and specs) * Less gross passing of notifications flag * Break out a separate mute modal with a hide-notifications checkbox. * Convert profile header mute to use mute modal * Satisfy eslint. * specs for MuteService notifications params * add trailing newlines to files for Pork :) * Put the label for the hide notifications checkbox in a label element. * Add a /api/v1/mutes/details route that just returns the array of mutes. * Define a serializer for /api/v1/mutes/details * Add more specs for the /api/v1/mutes/details endpoint * Expose whether a mute hides notifications in the api/v1/relationships endpoint * Show whether muted users' notifications are muted in account lists * Allow modifying the hide_notifications of a mute with the /api/v1/accounts/:id/mute endpoint * make the hide/unhide notifications buttons work * satisfy eslint * In probably dead code, replace a dispatch of muteAccount that was skipping the modal with launching the mute modal. * fix a missing import * add an explanatory comment to AccountInteractions * Refactor handling of default params for muting to make code cleaner * minor code style fixes oops * Fixed a typo that was breaking the account mute API endpoint * Apply white-space: nowrap to account relationships icons * Fix code style issues * Remove superfluous blank line * Rename /api/v1/mutes/details -> /api/v2/mutes * Don't serialize "account" in MuteSerializer Doing so is somewhat unnecessary since it's always the current user's account. * Fix wrong variable name in api/v2/mutes * Use Toggle in place of checkbox in the mute modal. * Make the Toggle in the mute modal look better * Code style changes in specs and removed an extra space * Code review suggestions from akihikodaki Also fixed a syntax error in tests for AccountInteractions. * Make AddHideNotificationsToMute Concurrent It's not clear how much this will benefit instances in practice, as the number of mutes tends to be pretty small, but this should prevent any blocking migrations nonetheless. * Fix up migration things * Remove /api/v2/mutes
2017-11-15 13:56:41 +11:00
it 'does not notify when sender is muted with hide_notifications' do
recipient.mute!(sender, notifications: true)
expect { subject }.to_not change(Notification, :count)
Optional notification muting (#5087) * Add a hide_notifications column to mutes * Add muting_notifications? and a notifications argument to mute! * block notifications in notify_service from hard muted accounts * Add specs for how mute! interacts with muting_notifications? * specs testing that hide_notifications in mutes actually hides notifications * Add support for muting notifications in MuteService * API support for muting notifications (and specs) * Less gross passing of notifications flag * Break out a separate mute modal with a hide-notifications checkbox. * Convert profile header mute to use mute modal * Satisfy eslint. * specs for MuteService notifications params * add trailing newlines to files for Pork :) * Put the label for the hide notifications checkbox in a label element. * Add a /api/v1/mutes/details route that just returns the array of mutes. * Define a serializer for /api/v1/mutes/details * Add more specs for the /api/v1/mutes/details endpoint * Expose whether a mute hides notifications in the api/v1/relationships endpoint * Show whether muted users' notifications are muted in account lists * Allow modifying the hide_notifications of a mute with the /api/v1/accounts/:id/mute endpoint * make the hide/unhide notifications buttons work * satisfy eslint * In probably dead code, replace a dispatch of muteAccount that was skipping the modal with launching the mute modal. * fix a missing import * add an explanatory comment to AccountInteractions * Refactor handling of default params for muting to make code cleaner * minor code style fixes oops * Fixed a typo that was breaking the account mute API endpoint * Apply white-space: nowrap to account relationships icons * Fix code style issues * Remove superfluous blank line * Rename /api/v1/mutes/details -> /api/v2/mutes * Don't serialize "account" in MuteSerializer Doing so is somewhat unnecessary since it's always the current user's account. * Fix wrong variable name in api/v2/mutes * Use Toggle in place of checkbox in the mute modal. * Make the Toggle in the mute modal look better * Code style changes in specs and removed an extra space * Code review suggestions from akihikodaki Also fixed a syntax error in tests for AccountInteractions. * Make AddHideNotificationsToMute Concurrent It's not clear how much this will benefit instances in practice, as the number of mutes tends to be pretty small, but this should prevent any blocking migrations nonetheless. * Fix up migration things * Remove /api/v2/mutes
2017-11-15 13:56:41 +11:00
end
it 'does notify when sender is muted without hide_notifications' do
recipient.mute!(sender, notifications: false)
expect { subject }.to change(Notification, :count)
Optional notification muting (#5087) * Add a hide_notifications column to mutes * Add muting_notifications? and a notifications argument to mute! * block notifications in notify_service from hard muted accounts * Add specs for how mute! interacts with muting_notifications? * specs testing that hide_notifications in mutes actually hides notifications * Add support for muting notifications in MuteService * API support for muting notifications (and specs) * Less gross passing of notifications flag * Break out a separate mute modal with a hide-notifications checkbox. * Convert profile header mute to use mute modal * Satisfy eslint. * specs for MuteService notifications params * add trailing newlines to files for Pork :) * Put the label for the hide notifications checkbox in a label element. * Add a /api/v1/mutes/details route that just returns the array of mutes. * Define a serializer for /api/v1/mutes/details * Add more specs for the /api/v1/mutes/details endpoint * Expose whether a mute hides notifications in the api/v1/relationships endpoint * Show whether muted users' notifications are muted in account lists * Allow modifying the hide_notifications of a mute with the /api/v1/accounts/:id/mute endpoint * make the hide/unhide notifications buttons work * satisfy eslint * In probably dead code, replace a dispatch of muteAccount that was skipping the modal with launching the mute modal. * fix a missing import * add an explanatory comment to AccountInteractions * Refactor handling of default params for muting to make code cleaner * minor code style fixes oops * Fixed a typo that was breaking the account mute API endpoint * Apply white-space: nowrap to account relationships icons * Fix code style issues * Remove superfluous blank line * Rename /api/v1/mutes/details -> /api/v2/mutes * Don't serialize "account" in MuteSerializer Doing so is somewhat unnecessary since it's always the current user's account. * Fix wrong variable name in api/v2/mutes * Use Toggle in place of checkbox in the mute modal. * Make the Toggle in the mute modal look better * Code style changes in specs and removed an extra space * Code review suggestions from akihikodaki Also fixed a syntax error in tests for AccountInteractions. * Make AddHideNotificationsToMute Concurrent It's not clear how much this will benefit instances in practice, as the number of mutes tends to be pretty small, but this should prevent any blocking migrations nonetheless. * Fix up migration things * Remove /api/v2/mutes
2017-11-15 13:56:41 +11:00
end
Account domain blocks (#2381) * Add <ostatus:conversation /> tag to Atom input/output Only uses ref attribute (not href) because href would be the alternate link that's always included also. Creates new conversation for every non-reply status. Carries over conversation for every reply. Keeps remote URIs verbatim, generates local URIs on the fly like the rest of them. * Conversation muting - prevents notifications that reference a conversation (including replies, favourites, reblogs) from being created. API endpoints /api/v1/statuses/:id/mute and /api/v1/statuses/:id/unmute Currently no way to tell when a status/conversation is muted, so the web UI only has a "disable notifications" button, doesn't work as a toggle * Display "Dismiss notifications" on all statuses in notifications column, not just own * Add "muted" as a boolean attribute on statuses JSON For now always false on contained reblogs, since it's only relevant for statuses returned from the notifications endpoint, which are not nested Remove "Disable notifications" from detailed status view, since it's only relevant in the notifications column * Up max class length * Remove pending test for conversation mute * Add tests, clean up * Rename to "mute conversation" and "unmute conversation" * Raise validation error when trying to mute/unmute status without conversation * Adding account domain blocks that filter notifications and public timelines * Add tests for domain blocks in notifications, public timelines Filter reblogs of blocked domains from home * Add API for listing and creating account domain blocks * API for creating/deleting domain blocks, tests for Status#ancestors and Status#descendants, filter domain blocks from them * Filter domains in streaming API * Update account_domain_block_spec.rb
2017-05-19 09:14:30 +10:00
it 'does not notify when sender\'s domain is blocked' do
recipient.block_domain!(sender.domain)
expect { subject }.to_not change(Notification, :count)
Account domain blocks (#2381) * Add <ostatus:conversation /> tag to Atom input/output Only uses ref attribute (not href) because href would be the alternate link that's always included also. Creates new conversation for every non-reply status. Carries over conversation for every reply. Keeps remote URIs verbatim, generates local URIs on the fly like the rest of them. * Conversation muting - prevents notifications that reference a conversation (including replies, favourites, reblogs) from being created. API endpoints /api/v1/statuses/:id/mute and /api/v1/statuses/:id/unmute Currently no way to tell when a status/conversation is muted, so the web UI only has a "disable notifications" button, doesn't work as a toggle * Display "Dismiss notifications" on all statuses in notifications column, not just own * Add "muted" as a boolean attribute on statuses JSON For now always false on contained reblogs, since it's only relevant for statuses returned from the notifications endpoint, which are not nested Remove "Disable notifications" from detailed status view, since it's only relevant in the notifications column * Up max class length * Remove pending test for conversation mute * Add tests, clean up * Rename to "mute conversation" and "unmute conversation" * Raise validation error when trying to mute/unmute status without conversation * Adding account domain blocks that filter notifications and public timelines * Add tests for domain blocks in notifications, public timelines Filter reblogs of blocked domains from home * Add API for listing and creating account domain blocks * API for creating/deleting domain blocks, tests for Status#ancestors and Status#descendants, filter domain blocks from them * Filter domains in streaming API * Update account_domain_block_spec.rb
2017-05-19 09:14:30 +10:00
end
it 'does still notify when sender\'s domain is blocked but sender is followed' do
recipient.block_domain!(sender.domain)
recipient.follow!(sender)
expect { subject }.to change(Notification, :count)
end
it 'does not notify when sender is silenced and not followed' do
sender.silence!
subject
expect(Notification.find_by(activity: activity).filtered?).to be true
end
it 'does not notify when recipient is suspended' do
recipient.suspend!
expect { subject }.to_not change(Notification, :count)
end
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-29 01:00:35 +11:00
describe 'reblogs' do
let(:status) { Fabricate(:status, account: Fabricate(:account)) }
let(:activity) { Fabricate(:status, account: sender, reblog: status) }
let(:type) { :reblog }
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-29 01:00:35 +11:00
it 'shows reblogs by default' do
recipient.follow!(sender)
expect { subject }.to change(Notification, :count)
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-29 01:00:35 +11:00
end
it 'shows reblogs when explicitly enabled' do
recipient.follow!(sender, reblogs: true)
expect { subject }.to change(Notification, :count)
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-29 01:00:35 +11:00
end
it 'shows reblogs when disabled' do
recipient.follow!(sender, reblogs: false)
expect { subject }.to change(Notification, :count)
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-29 01:00:35 +11:00
end
end
context 'with muted and blocked users' do
let(:asshole) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'asshole') }
let(:reply_to) { Fabricate(:status, account: asshole) }
let(:activity) { Fabricate(:mention, account: recipient, status: Fabricate(:status, account: sender, thread: reply_to)) }
let(:type) { :mention }
it 'does not notify when conversation is muted' do
recipient.mute_conversation!(activity.status.conversation)
expect { subject }.to_not change(Notification, :count)
end
it 'does not notify when it is a reply to a blocked user' do
recipient.block!(asshole)
expect { subject }.to_not change(Notification, :count)
end
end
context 'with sender as recipient' do
let(:sender) { recipient }
it 'does not notify when recipient is the sender' do
expect { subject }.to_not change(Notification, :count)
end
end
describe 'email' do
before do
user.settings.update('notification_emails.follow': enabled)
user.save
end
context 'when email notification is enabled' do
let(:enabled) { true }
it 'sends email', :inline_jobs do
emails = capture_emails { subject }
expect(emails.size)
.to eq(1)
expect(emails.first)
.to have_attributes(
to: contain_exactly(user.email),
subject: eq(I18n.t('notification_mailer.follow.subject', name: sender.acct))
)
end
end
context 'when email notification is disabled' do
let(:enabled) { false }
it "doesn't send email" do
emails = capture_emails { subject }
expect(emails).to be_empty
end
end
end
context 'when the blocked sender has a role' do
let(:sender) { Fabricate(:user, role: sender_role).account }
let(:activity) { Fabricate(:mention, status: Fabricate(:status, account: sender)) }
let(:type) { :mention }
before do
recipient.block!(sender)
end
context 'when the role is a visible moderator' do
let(:sender_role) { Fabricate(:user_role, highlighted: true, permissions: UserRole::FLAGS[:manage_users]) }
it 'does notify' do
expect { subject }.to change(Notification, :count)
end
end
context 'when the role is a non-visible moderator' do
let(:sender_role) { Fabricate(:user_role, highlighted: false, permissions: UserRole::FLAGS[:manage_users]) }
it 'does not notify' do
expect { subject }.to_not change(Notification, :count)
end
end
context 'when the role is a visible non-moderator' do
let(:sender_role) { Fabricate(:user_role, highlighted: true) }
it 'does not notify' do
expect { subject }.to_not change(Notification, :count)
end
end
end
context 'with filtered notifications' do
let(:unknown) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'unknown') }
let(:status) { Fabricate(:status, account: unknown) }
let(:activity) { Fabricate(:mention, account: recipient, status: status) }
let(:type) { :mention }
before do
Fabricate(:notification_policy, account: recipient, filter_not_following: true)
end
it 'creates a filtered notification' do
expect { subject }.to change(Notification, :count)
expect(Notification.last).to be_filtered
end
context 'when no notification request exists' do
it 'creates a notification request' do
expect { subject }.to change(NotificationRequest, :count)
end
end
context 'when a notification request exists' do
let!(:notification_request) do
Fabricate(:notification_request, account: recipient, from_account: unknown, last_status: Fabricate(:status, account: unknown))
end
it 'updates the existing notification request' do
expect { subject }.to_not change(NotificationRequest, :count)
expect(notification_request.reload.last_status).to eq status
end
end
end
describe NotifyService::DropCondition do
subject { described_class.new(notification) }
let(:activity) { Fabricate(:mention, status: Fabricate(:status)) }
let(:notification) { Fabricate(:notification, type: :mention, activity: activity, from_account: activity.status.account, account: activity.account) }
describe '#drop' do
context 'when sender is silenced and recipient has a default policy' do
before do
notification.from_account.silence!
end
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject.drop?).to be false
end
end
context 'when sender is silenced and recipient has a policy to ignore silenced accounts' do
before do
notification.from_account.silence!
notification.account.create_notification_policy!(for_limited_accounts: :drop)
end
it 'returns true' do
expect(subject.drop?).to be true
end
end
context 'when sender is new and recipient has a default policy' do
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject.drop?).to be false
end
end
context 'when sender is new and recipient has a policy to ignore silenced accounts' do
before do
notification.account.create_notification_policy!(for_new_accounts: :drop)
end
it 'returns true' do
expect(subject.drop?).to be true
end
end
context 'when sender is new and followed and recipient has a policy to ignore silenced accounts' do
before do
notification.account.create_notification_policy!(for_new_accounts: :drop)
notification.account.follow!(notification.from_account)
end
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject.drop?).to be false
end
end
context 'when recipient has blocked sender' do
before do
notification.account.block!(notification.from_account)
end
it 'returns true' do
expect(subject.drop?).to be true
end
end
end
end
describe NotifyService::FilterCondition do
subject { described_class.new(notification) }
let(:activity) { Fabricate(:mention, status: Fabricate(:status)) }
let(:notification) { Fabricate(:notification, type: :mention, activity: activity, from_account: activity.status.account, account: activity.account) }
describe '#filter?' do
context 'when sender is silenced' do
before do
notification.from_account.silence!
end
it 'returns true' do
expect(subject.filter?).to be true
end
context 'when recipient follows sender' do
before do
notification.account.follow!(notification.from_account)
end
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject.filter?).to be false
end
end
context 'when recipient is allowing limited accounts' do
before do
notification.account.create_notification_policy!(for_limited_accounts: :accept)
end
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject.filter?).to be false
end
end
end
context 'when recipient is filtering not-followed senders' do
before do
Fabricate(:notification_policy, account: notification.account, filter_not_following: true)
end
it 'returns true' do
expect(subject.filter?).to be true
end
context 'when sender has permission' do
before do
Fabricate(:notification_permission, account: notification.account, from_account: notification.from_account)
end
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject.filter?).to be false
end
end
context 'when sender is followed by recipient' do
before do
notification.account.follow!(notification.from_account)
end
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject.filter?).to be false
end
end
end
context 'when recipient is filtering not-followers' do
before do
Fabricate(:notification_policy, account: notification.account, filter_not_followers: true)
end
it 'returns true' do
expect(subject.filter?).to be true
end
context 'when sender has permission' do
before do
Fabricate(:notification_permission, account: notification.account, from_account: notification.from_account)
end
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject.filter?).to be false
end
end
context 'when sender follows recipient' do
before do
notification.from_account.follow!(notification.account)
end
it 'returns true' do
expect(subject.filter?).to be true
end
end
context 'when sender follows recipient for longer than 3 days' do
before do
follow = notification.from_account.follow!(notification.account)
follow.update(created_at: 4.days.ago)
end
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject.filter?).to be false
end
end
end
context 'when recipient is filtering new accounts' do
before do
Fabricate(:notification_policy, account: notification.account, filter_new_accounts: true)
end
it 'returns true' do
expect(subject.filter?).to be true
end
context 'when sender has permission' do
before do
Fabricate(:notification_permission, account: notification.account, from_account: notification.from_account)
end
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject.filter?).to be false
end
end
context 'when sender is older than 30 days' do
before do
notification.from_account.update(created_at: 31.days.ago)
end
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject.filter?).to be false
end
end
end
context 'when recipient is not filtering anyone' do
before do
Fabricate(:notification_policy, account: notification.account)
end
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject.filter?).to be false
end
end
context 'when recipient is filtering unsolicited private mentions' do
before do
Fabricate(:notification_policy, account: notification.account, filter_private_mentions: true)
end
context 'when notification is not a private mention' do
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject.filter?).to be false
end
end
context 'when notification is a private mention' do
before do
notification.target_status.update(visibility: :direct)
end
it 'returns true' do
expect(subject.filter?).to be true
end
context 'when the message chain is initiated by recipient, but sender is not mentioned' do
before do
original_status = Fabricate(:status, account: notification.account, visibility: :direct)
notification.target_status.update(thread: original_status)
end
it 'returns true' do
expect(subject.filter?).to be true
end
end
context 'when the message chain is initiated by recipient, and sender is mentioned' do
before do
original_status = Fabricate(:status, account: notification.account, visibility: :direct)
notification.target_status.update(thread: original_status)
Fabricate(:mention, status: original_status, account: notification.from_account)
end
it 'returns false' do
expect(subject.filter?).to be false
end
end
context 'when the sender is mentioned in an unrelated message chain' do
before do
original_status = Fabricate(:status, visibility: :direct)
intermediary_status = Fabricate(:status, visibility: :direct, thread: original_status)
notification.target_status.update(thread: intermediary_status)
Fabricate(:mention, status: original_status, account: notification.from_account)
end
it 'returns true' do
expect(subject.filter?).to be true
end
end
end
end
end
end
end