chinwagsocial/app/models/follow.rb

82 lines
2.3 KiB
Ruby
Raw Normal View History

# frozen_string_literal: true
# == Schema Information
#
# Table name: follows
#
# id :bigint(8) not null, primary key
# created_at :datetime not null
# updated_at :datetime not null
# account_id :bigint(8) not null
# target_account_id :bigint(8) not null
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-29 01:00:35 +11:00
# show_reblogs :boolean default(TRUE), not null
# uri :string
# notify :boolean default(FALSE), not null
# languages :string is an Array
#
2016-08-18 01:56:23 +10:00
class Follow < ApplicationRecord
include Paginable
include RelationshipCacheable
include RateLimitable
include FollowLimitable
rate_limit by: :account, family: :follows
belongs_to :account
belongs_to :target_account, class_name: 'Account'
2016-02-23 02:00:20 +11:00
has_one :notification, as: :activity, dependent: :destroy
validates :account_id, uniqueness: { scope: :target_account_id }
validates :languages, language: true
scope :recent, -> { reorder(id: :desc) }
def local?
false # Force uri_for to use uri attribute
end
def revoke_request!
FollowRequest.create!(account: account, target_account: target_account, show_reblogs: show_reblogs, notify: notify, languages: languages, uri: uri)
destroy!
end
before_validation :set_uri, only: :create
after_create :increment_cache_counters
after_destroy :remove_endorsements
after_destroy :decrement_cache_counters
after_commit :invalidate_follow_recommendations_cache
after_commit :invalidate_hash_cache
private
def set_uri
self.uri = ActivityPub::TagManager.instance.generate_uri_for(self) if uri.nil?
end
def remove_endorsements
AccountPin.where(target_account_id: target_account_id, account_id: account_id).delete_all
end
def increment_cache_counters
account&.increment_count!(:following_count)
target_account&.increment_count!(:followers_count)
end
def decrement_cache_counters
account&.decrement_count!(:following_count)
target_account&.decrement_count!(:followers_count)
end
Add follower synchronization mechanism (#14510) * Add support for followers synchronization on the receiving end Check the `collectionSynchronization` attribute on `Create` and `Announce` activities and synchronize followers from provided collection if possible. * Add tests for followers synchronization on the receiving end * Add support for follower synchronization on the sender's end * Add tests for the sending end * Switch from AS attributes to HTTP header Replace the custom `collectionSynchronization` ActivityStreams attribute by an HTTP header (`X-AS-Collection-Synchronization`) with the same syntax as the `Signature` header and the following fields: - `collectionId` to specify which collection to synchronize - `digest` for the SHA256 hex-digest of the list of followers known on the receiving instance (where “receiving instance” is determined by accounts sharing the same host name for their ActivityPub actor `id`) - `url` of a collection that should be fetched by the instance actor Internally, move away from the webfinger-based `domain` attribute and use account `uri` prefix to group accounts. * Add environment variable to disable followers synchronization Since the whole mechanism relies on some new preconditions that, in some extremely rare cases, might not be met, add an environment variable (DISABLE_FOLLOWERS_SYNCHRONIZATION) to disable the mechanism altogether and avoid followers being incorrectly removed. The current conditions are: 1. all managed accounts' actor `id` and inbox URL have the same URI scheme and netloc. 2. all accounts whose actor `id` or inbox URL share the same URI scheme and netloc as a managed account must be managed by the same Mastodon instance as well. As far as Mastodon is concerned, breaking those preconditions require extensive configuration changes in the reverse proxy and might also cause other issues. Therefore, this environment variable provides a way out for people with highly unusual configurations, and can be safely ignored for the overwhelming majority of Mastodon administrators. * Only set follower synchronization header on non-public statuses This is to avoid unnecessary computations and allow Follow-related activities to be handled by the usual codepath instead of going through the synchronization mechanism (otherwise, any Follow/Undo/Accept activity would trigger the synchronization mechanism even if processing the activity itself would be enough to re-introduce synchronization) * Change how ActivityPub::SynchronizeFollowersService handles follow requests If the remote lists a local follower which we only know has sent a follow request, consider the follow request as accepted instead of sending an Undo. * Integrate review feeback - rename X-AS-Collection-Synchronization to Collection-Synchronization - various minor refactoring and code style changes * Only select required fields when computing followers_hash * Use actor URI rather than webfinger domain in synchronization endpoint * Change hash computation to be a XOR of individual hashes Makes it much easier to be memory-efficient, and avoid sorting discrepancy issues. * Marginally improve followers_hash computation speed * Further improve hash computation performances by using pluck_each
2020-10-22 03:04:09 +11:00
def invalidate_hash_cache
return if account.local? && target_account.local?
Rails.cache.delete("followers_hash:#{target_account_id}:#{account.synchronization_uri_prefix}")
end
def invalidate_follow_recommendations_cache
Rails.cache.delete("follow_recommendations/#{account_id}")
end
2016-02-23 02:00:20 +11:00
end